منابع مشابه
Statistical reviewing for medical journals.
This paper reviews the difficulties associated with being a statistical reviewer for a medical journal. As background, I consider first the use of statistical reviewers by medical journals, medical journals' policies on statistical peer review, and the limited evidence of its effectiveness. The assessment of a manuscript is considered under the headings of design, methods of analysis, presentat...
متن کاملA Personal View Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
Morton JP. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know? Adv Physiol Educ 33: 7–9, 2009; doi:10.1152/ advan.90207.2008.—In the sequel to their guidelines for reporting statistics in American Physiological Society journals, Curran-Everett and Benos highlighted that the initial guidelines of 2004 have had little effect on the statistical reporting...
متن کاملReviewing scientific manuscripts: how much statistical knowledge should a reviewer really know?
In the sequel to their guidelines for reporting statistics in American Physiological Society journals, Curran-Everett and Benos highlighted that the initial guidelines of 2004 have had little effect on the statistical reporting practices of authors. In the present article, I suggest that the guidelines have also had little impact on both journal reviewers and editors. I present three cases of s...
متن کاملSuggestions for Reviewing Texts
مقدمه: یکی از مهمترین مراحل در فرآیند تحقیق، هدایت بررسی متون بصورتی مناسب می باشد. این فرآیند از نظر بیشتر دانشجویان و محققین وظیفه ای سنگین و خطیر است(۱). امروزه با توجه به رشد و توسعه فن آوری اطلاعات، محققین با انفجار اطلاعات مواجه هستند، به نحوی که تقریبا در یک روز ۶۰۰۰ متن علمی جدید منتشر می شود و آگاهیهای علمی تقریبا پس از گذشت هر ۵ سال دو برابر می گردد.
متن کاملReviewing a reviewer.
We are all authors, but at the same time we are all reviewers. We write articles, anticipate that they will be reviewed quickly and favorably and hope that they will be accepted. We write reviews and anticipate that our recommendations will be honored and our concerns will be addressed. The work of authors is visible and rewarding (if published), the work of reviewers is anonymous and not that ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain
سال: 2009
ISSN: 0017-8748,1526-4610
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2008.01322.x